| Of Tapes and Tapping Technical intelligence scores over human intelligence |
|
India
can rightly feel
satisfied with the ace intelligence scoop and the mileage it has got from
the release of the Kargil tapes. That
intelligence is no more a cloak and dagger affair, should have dawned on
us half a century back. We dithered in creating an integrated set-up for
signal interception, satellite imagery, and making and breaking codes,
because of the pressures from our sprawling network of spies and human
analysts, led by a technically illiterate bureaucracy. The Indian
establishment is loath to give signals intelligence (Sigint) its due,
though time and again it saved the day lending the country a diplomatic or
military edge. We have been largely dependent on humans. In this age of
high-resolution satellite imagery, electronic surveillance and virtual
intelligence, we brag of obtaining early warning of the enemy intrusion
from gujjars and sheep grazers? For
more than a decade and a half, I have been harping that The
country needs an intelligence organization similar to the National
Security Agency (NSA), pooling all its assets of signal
intelligence, cryptography and cryptanalysis. It should be under the MOD
as in the Sigint
is expensive. Both the hardware and software cost a lot. Whereas one can
understand difficulties in obtaining state of the art equipment and
appreciate dependence of indigenous R&D on dual use technologies that
attract denial regimes, neglect of software development is inexcusable in
view of our proven expertise in this field. More than
resources, it is a question of mindset. Had we continued to
pay attention to Sigint, Rajiv Gandhi’s murder could have been
prevented. Lastly,
let us remember that intelligence and security are two sides of the same
coin. The Pak military is disconcerted by our smartness and would exploit
chinks in our communications security (Comsec). I quote George Oswell, who
wrote in 1984, "Any sound that Winston made above the level of a very
low whisper, would be picked up by it … There was of course no way
of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment …
you had to live -- did live, from habit that became instinct -- in the
assumption that every sound you made was overheard and, except in
darkness, every movement scrutinized." I
hope the other George is listening. |